languages of choice

from Jargon File (4.4.4, 14 Aug 2003)
languages of choice
 n.

   {C}, {Perl}, {Python}, {Java} and {LISP} -- the dominant languages in
   open-source development. This list has changed over time, but slowly.
   Java bumped C++ off of it, and Python appears to be recruiting people
   who would otherwise gravitate to LISP (which used to be much more
   important than it is now). Smalltalk and Prolog are also popular in
   small but influential communities.

   The {Real Programmer}s who loved FORTRAN and assembler have pretty
   much all retired or died since 1990. Assembler is generally no longer
   considered interesting or appropriate for anything but {HLL}
   implementation, {glue}, and a few time-critical and hardware-specific
   uses in systems programs. FORTRAN occupies a shrinking niche in
   scientific programming.

   Most hackers tend to frown on languages like {Pascal} and Ada, which
   don't give them the near-total freedom considered necessary for
   hacking (see {bondage-and-discipline language}), and to regard
   everything even remotely connected with {COBOL} or other traditional
   {DP} languages as a total and unmitigated {loss}.
    
from The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing (8 July 2008)
languages of choice

   {C} and {Lisp}.  Nearly every hacker knows one of these, and
   most good ones are fluent in both.  Smalltalk and Prolog are
   also popular in small but influential communities.

   There is also a rapidly dwindling category of older hackers
   with Fortran, or even assembler, as their language of choice.
   They often prefer to be known as {Real Programmers}, and other
   hackers consider them a bit odd (see "{The Story of Mel}").
   Assembler is generally no longer considered interesting or
   appropriate for anything but {HLL} implementation, {glue}, and
   a few time-critical and hardware-specific uses in systems
   programs.  Fortran occupies a shrinking niche in scientific
   programming.

   Most hackers tend to frown on languages like {Pascal} and
   {Ada}, which don't give them the near-total freedom considered
   necessary for hacking (see {bondage-and-discipline language}),
   and to regard everything even remotely connected with {COBOL}
   or other traditional {card walloper} languages as a total and
   unmitigated {loss}.

   [{Jargon File}]
    

[email protected]